Full Article: PDF
Scientific Object Identifier: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-05-73-40
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2019.05.73.40
Language: English
Citation: Yusupova, D. R. (2019). Comparison of prosody used in the works by Alisher Navoi and Abdurakhman Jami. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 05 (73), 281-285. Soi: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-05-73-40 Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2019.05.73.40 |
Pages: 281-285
Published: 30.05.2019
Abstract: In the literary environment of Hirat in XV century aruz as a scientific and theoretical science reached its peak. Works related to prosody were studied by Abdurakhman Jami in his “Risala-i Aruz” and “Mezan-ul Avzan” by Alisher Navoi. They are the best scholars who developed great significan works on prosody. Jami’s “Risala-i Aruz” served as a primary source for the work of Alisher Navoi, who made use of various sources on aruz in Persian-Tajik literature. According to Navoi, no work on the theory of aruz in Turkic literature had been written before Alisher Navoi. So, the purpose of Navoi was to analysis more complete by such literary styles as bahrs, rukns, wazns and doiras. His work is perfect and it has much information on Turkic literature. Both scholars had similar opinions on the chapters of aruz – juzv, zihof and furu’. Both Navoi and Jami developed 6 juzvs, 45 zihofs and 60 furu’s. Abdurahmon Jami describes four doiras but mostly researched contemporary aruz studies in “Al-Mu’jam”, in particular. Alisher Navoi adds three more doiras and starts the tradition of poetry writing in two devices – komil in “Doirai Mukhtalita” and tawil in “Doirai Mushtahiba” which were described by him as matbu’ (pleasant).
Key words: aruz (prosody), bakhr (metrical form), vazn (meter), rukn (feet), juzv (the smallest unit of aruz), zikhof (changes), furu’, doira (circle).
|
